ESRS S2 Workers in the value chain

ESG Content

ESRS S2 Workers in the value chain

voestalpine sources a wide range of materials, products, and services from a large number of suppliers around the globe. It supplies its products—mostly semi-finished products—to companies from various sectors and countries. The analysis and management of indirect impacts along the value chain remains primarily focused on the upstream sector, specifically on the supply chain.

The purchasing principles are based on the Group Strategy 2030+ and the sustainability strategy. The aim is to minimize (potential) negative impacts in the supply chain and associated risks for the company.

As part of its supply chain management, voestalpine documents social and environmental impacts associated with the activities of suppliers—including potential adverse affects on their workforce. The company adopts a risk-based approach that takes into account sector-specific and country-specific risks. As part of preparations for the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) requirements, the current due diligence process is to be continuously expanded, and a Group-wide due diligence management system is to be implemented.

Violations of labor or human rights—child or forced labor, for example—may result in financial risks and reputational damage. These risks have increased: on the one hand due to stricter legal requirements arising from the Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) and the planned EU Directive CSDDD, and on the other hand due to higher demands voiced by stakeholders with regard to transparency and responsibility.

Violations may result in sanctions, reputation damage, and the consequent loss of customers. This risk has been classified as material as part of the double materiality assessment (see ESRS 2, IRO-1 disclosure). For an overview of all material IROs, see SBM-3 in chapter ESRS 2. The following table provides specific information on SBM-3:

Workers in the value chain – IRO

Topic/sub‑topic
/
sub-sub‑topic

 

 

 

Impact, risk, opportunity (IRO)

 

Description

 

Impact on strategy and business model

 

Value chain

 

Time horizon

 

Affected stakeholders

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Worker rights and conditions in the value chain

 

ǃ

 

Financial claims and loss of reputation relating to potential labor exploitation in the supply chain (direct payments, in particular due to CSDDD; indirect losses due to poorer sustainability ratings)

 

Potential labor exploitation within voestalpine’s global supply chain carries the risk of financial claims, such as sanctions (e.g., due to CSDDD), as well as reputational damage

 

Building resilient and sustainable supply chains

Increased risk management

Strategic selection of partnerships

 

▶▷▷

 

〇⬤⬤⬤

 

  • Workers in the supply chain, local communities
  • Suppliers
  • Legislators
  • Local, national, and international authorities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Key

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Actual positive impact

 

▶▷▷

 

Upstream

 

⬤〇〇〇

 

< 1 year

 

 

 

 

 

Actual negative impact

 

▷▶▷

 

Own operations

 

〇⬤〇〇

 

1–5 years

 

 

 

 

 

Potential positive impact

 

▷▷▶

 

Downstream

 

〇〇⬤〇

 

5–10 years

 

 

 

 

 

Potential negative impact

 

 

 

 

 

〇〇〇⬤

 

10+ years

 

 

 

 

 

Opportunity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ǃ

 

Risk

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Impact, risk, and opportunity management

S2-1 – POLICIES RELATED TO VALUE CHAIN WORKERS

As an undertaking, voestalpine is committed to respecting human and labor rights throughout its value chain. This obligation applies not only to its own companies but also to its business partners. Requirements for voestalpine companies and business partners are laid down in the mandatory Code of Conduct for Business Partners (CoC-BP), which together with the Due Diligence User Manual, the Human Rights Policy, the Group Procurement Policy, the General Terms and Conditions of Purchase (GPO), and the Sustainable Supply Chain Roadmap forms the basis for responsible cooperation and the fulfillment of due diligence in the value chain.

These voestalpine policies for reducing (potential) negative impacts in the supply chain take into account both legal requirements and international frameworks such as the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, the principles of the UN Global Compact, the International Charter of Human Rights, and the UN Convention against Corruption.

The table below lists the main internationally recognized frameworks for the implementation of human rights and environmental due diligence frameworks with which the specified policies are consistent.

Overview of internationally recognized human rights due diligence frameworks

Organization

 

Guideline

 

Details

 

 

 

 

 

United Nations (UN)

 

UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs)

 

  • Basic framework for corporate responsibility and human rights
  • Guidelines for undertakings, governments, and civil society in their efforts to prevent and manage the risk of negative impacts on human rights

International Labor Organization (ILO)

 

Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work

 

  • Competent body for the establishment and respect of international labor standards and the promotion of fundamental rights at work

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)

 

OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Business Conduct

 

  • Provides practical guidance on key topics such as climate change, biodiversity, technology, business integrity, and supply chain due diligence
  • Refers to other international standards and to international commitments and regulations (e.g., the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the Paris Agreement)
  • Represents a common understanding between governments and stakeholders of the due diligence framework for responsible business conduct

The Code of Conduct for Business Partners (CoC-BP) and the voestalpine General Conditions of Purchase, which apply to all suppliers, set out a number of criteria for promoting sustainable sourcing and, in particular, ensuring human rights are respected. Any deviation from or failure to comply with internationally recognized frameworks, such as the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights or the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work, can be reported using the established grievance process.

Due to increased legal requirements and the associated reporting obligations, voestalpine standardized its approach to the obligation to prove compliance with human rights and environmental standards for all purchasing activities in 2024 and set forth corresponding requirements in its Procurement Policy. Monitoring compliance with the above-mentioned international frameworks therefore also takes place on the basis of the Group’s Procurement Policy.

The current version of the CoC-BP was adopted by the Management Board of voestalpine at the end of the business year 2022/23. This Code defines voestalpine’s principles and requirements, and is designed to ensure that the practices of business partners conform to both voestalpine’s values as well as the pertinent laws and regulations. Based on voestalpine’s Human Rights Policy and General Code of Conduct, the CoC-BP addresses the following issues, with a particular focus on the concerns of value chain workers, which are outlined in the section entitled “Corporate Social Responsibility.”

  • Compliance and responsible business conduct
    • Compliance with laws
    • Prohibition of active and passive corruption
    • Prohibition of bribery (e.g., sending gifts to employees)
    • Money laundering
    • Fair competition
    • Protection of information, intellectual property, and data
    • Trade restrictions and sanctions
  • Social responsibility
    • Respect for human rights and working conditions
    • Prohibition of child labor
    • Prohibition of forced and bonded labor, human trafficking, and modern slavery
    • Collective bargaining and the right to freedom of association
    • Diversity, equal opportunity, and prohibition of discrimination
    • Compensation and working hours
    • health & safety in the workplace
    • Training of security staff
    • Local communities and indigenous peoples
  • Environment and climate change mitigation
    • Carbon footprint
  • Supply chain management
    • Raw materials and source minerals
  • Reporting of misconduct
  • Cooperation and participation

Business partners are required to inform their employees and direct suppliers that they can also report wrongdoing and violations of CoC-BP requirements using the voestalpine whistleblower system.

As a Group-wide directive, the Due Diligence User Manual governs the due diligence procedures in supply chain management and outlines measures for awarding contracts in procurement. Supply chain management at voestalpine follows a risk-based approach. The identification, assessment, and prioritization of risks is based on the OECD guidelines for fulfilling the due diligence requirements for responsible business conduct. This approach ensures that resources are employed in a targeted manner and that the most important and urgent issues are addressed first. In practice, this risk-based approach is implemented in a three-stage process (see figure below). In the first step, supplier prioritization, any risk exposure of suppliers on the basis of country and product group-specific risks is identified. This analysis and categorization must be carried out every year for all active suppliers, including those that were added as new suppliers in the year in question. In the second step, performance review measures are conducted for all suppliers previously classified as high or medium risk, in order to understand their individual sustainability performance and specify the actual risks. The third step aims to achieve continuous supplier development to improve their sustainability performance and awareness of their responsibility with regard to human rights and the environment, and ultimately to avoid and mitigate risks. Here too, action is based on the actual requirements.

Risk-based approach for sustainable supplier management

Risk-based approach for sustainable supplier management (graphic)

The analysis of product group-specific risks focuses on product groups that are purchased on a regular basis by voestalpine and that are associated with potential sustainability risks. Sustainability risks are defined as potential violations of laws and guidelines on human rights and environmental protection (see table below). This also includes the risk of potential violations of human and labor rights that may affect workers in the supply chain. These human rights risks are at the heart of the analysis and are summarized in the table below.

Relevant topics for risk assessment

Relevant risks in relation to human rights

 

Human rights risks arising from the characteristics of the industry, its activities, products, and manufacturing processes, including

  • Child labor
  • Forced labor
  • Non-compliance with occupational health & safety
  • Disregard for freedom of association
  • Unequal treatment of employees
  • Failure to pay a reasonable living wage
  • Deployment of security forces on site when the prohibition of torture or the freedom of association are violated or when life and limb are endangered
  • Impairment of people’s livelihoods through soil contamination, water, and air pollution, general emissions, excessive water consumption, and unlawful displacements, and land confiscation, for example through the establishment of new production facilities

Relevant environmental risks

 

Relevant environmental risks include:

  • Use of mercury and treatment of mercury waste
  • Production and use of persistent organic pollutants (POPs)
  • Environmentally harmful treatment, collection, storage, and disposal of POP waste
  • Export and import of hazardous substances
  • Other risks that need to be taken into account due to regulatory requirements (e.g., the EU Supply Chain Directive) include CO2 emissions

The country-specific risk assessment is carried out using public indices that encompass governance and sustainability. Two widely available sources are used by voestalpine to this end: the Worldwide Governance Indicators (source: World Bank) and the CSR Risk Check (source: MVO Nederland). A total of 213 countries and territories are covered by these indices. The combination of the two indices results in an overall risk assessment for each country and region. The following table shows the result of this risk assessment in the business year 2024/25. The data was based on all active suppliers in the business year. Internal value-added orders were not taken into account.

Outcome of the risk assessment 2024/25

Vulnerable suppliers

 

Percentage of total suppliers (%)

 

 

 

Suppliers from potentially at-risk product groups

 

19.0

Suppliers from potentially at-risk countries

 

13.0

Suppliers from potentially at-risk product groups in potentially at-risk countries

 

3.0

On the basis of the initial risk assessment, voestalpine specifically requests additional evidence from business partners at risk to verify the extent to which they meet the requirements of the CoC-BP. This takes place in the form of a Supplier Assessment Questionnaire (SAQ).

Tasks, responsibilities, strategies, management systems, and performance indicators (KPIs) related to the content of the CoC-BP are requested and reviewed by voestalpine. If required, voestalpine assists its business partners with implementing the requirements. Where necessary, training for suppliers or on-site visits are carried out in order to improve their understanding and ensure the implementation of effective improvement measures. The cooperation and participation of the business partners is required in this regard. voestalpine reserves the right to take appropriate action in the event of violations and an unwillingness to cooperate on the part of suppliers, which may ultimately lead to suspension or termination of the supply relationship.

A user-friendly IT system is used to collaboratively communicate with suppliers to collect their responses, analyze the questionnaires, and draw up action plans.

Policy overview

IROs addressed

 

Policy

 

Core content

 

Scope of the policy

 

Responsibility and monitoring

 

Other comments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financial claims and loss of reputation relating to potential labor exploitation in the supply chain (direct payments, in particular due to CSDDD; indirect losses due to poorer sustainability ratings)

 

Code of Conduct for Business Partners

 

Commitment to respect human and labor rights throughout the value chain

Consideration of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs), Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work, and the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Business Conduct

 

Upstream value chain

Downstream value chain to a partial extent (excl. use by customers, self-pickups)

 

Head of the Corporate Legal Department
Monitoring and compliance regulations: Compliance organization

 

  • The result of numerous conversations and discussions at the level of the Management Board as well as among executive management and department heads of the voestalpine Group
  • Code of Conduct as well as the International Bill of Human Rights, the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, the principles of the UN Global Compact, and the core labor standards of the International Labor Organization (ILO)
  • Available in multiple languages on the intranet and on the website

 

Due Diligence User Manual

 

Group-wide guideline to describe the due diligence processes in supplier management (supplier onboarding, Supplier Assessment Questionnaire (SAQ), supplier evaluation, and on-site visits)

 

Upstream value chain

Downstream value chain to a partial extent (excl. use by customers, self-pickups)

 

Procurement board

 

  • Consideration of stakeholder analysis in policy
  • Internal communication to all users

 

Human Rights Policy

 

Commitment to protecting human rights without exception through adherence to the International Charter of Human Rights, the UN Principles on Business and Human Rights, the ILO Core Labor Standards, and the UN Global Compact

Commitment to the right to collective bargaining and freedom of association, compliance with legal working regulations, the abolition of child, forced, and compulsory labor as well as human trafficking and modern slavery, the elimination of discrimination, and other human rights issues

 

Own operations (companies in which voestalpine AG has a direct or indirect holding of 50% or more, or over which it exerts control in another manner)

All production companies

Own workforce (employees and non-employees)

Upstream value chain (business partners in the upstream value chain)

 

Head of Group Sustainability

 

 

Procurement policy

 

Ensures the presence of binding framework conditions for procurement and generally governs procurement requirements and procedures

Includes principles for sustainable procurement

 

Complete coverage of the upstream value chain

Partial coverage of own operations

Partial coverage of the downstream value chain (excl. use and self-pickup)

 

Board of Procurement

 

 

General Terms and Conditions of Purchase

 

Pre-formulated contractual terms that serve as the basis for contract agreements, including establishing criteria to promote sustainable procurement and respect for human rights

 

Upstream value chain

Downstream value chain to a partial extent

 

Board of Procurement

 

  • Consideration of stakeholder analysis in policy

 

Sustainable supply chain roadmap

 

Strategic plan with measurable milestones to ensure transparency and sustainability in the supply chain

 

Upstream value chain

Downstream value chain to a partial extent

 

Board of Procurement

 

S2-2 – PROCESSES FOR ENGAGING WITH VALUE CHAIN WORKERS ABOUT IMPACTS

As an undertaking, voestalpine does not currently have a standardized process in place for engaging with value chain workers, apart from the whistleblower system, which can also be used by value chain workers. A corresponding procedure is currently being developed in preparation for the requirements of the CSDDD. In the absence of a formal procedure, value chain workers will be engaged in the event of an incident, such as suspected violations.

S2-3 – PROCESSES TO REMEDIATE NEGATIVE IMPACTS AND CHANNELS FOR VALUE CHAIN WORKERS TO RAISE CONCERNS

EXISTENCE OF A GRIEVANCE PROCESS

In addition to the risk-based due diligence process, voestalpine has set up a whistleblowing system on its website for raising grievances and, if necessary, takes situation-specific action to remedy and compensate for any violations. The whistleblower system is available not only to internal employees, but also to workers in the value chain and other stakeholders groups to report possible violations of legal requirements or internal guidelines—such as voestalpine’s Code of Conduct for Business Partners (CoC-BP).

Business partners also undertake, over and above the General Terms and Conditions of Purchase (GPO) and the Code of Conduct for Business Partners (CoC-BP), to inform their own employees and direct suppliers about the option of using the voestalpine whistleblower system. The system thus helps to identify potential negative impacts on value chain workers.

Unless there is a legal obligation to set up a whistleblower system, voestalpine recommends that its business partners establish an appropriate system that allows both open and anonymous reporting.

The whistleblower system has established itself as a trusted point of contact within the voestalpine workforce, and is actively used by whistleblowers. In light of its high level of acceptance and the effectiveness of the remediation measures, there are plans to inform the workforce in the value chain of its availability, allowing them also to raise grievances or to point out irregularities. All reports are treated confidentially.

No further action is currently being pursued to inform value chain workers about the ways in which they can report concerns or complaints. At present, no assessment takes place to determine whether value chain workers are familiar with and trust these grievance mechanism structures or practices. voestalpine is working to establish a general mechanism for working with value chain workers to strengthen dialogue and communication in the long term.

For more information on the whistleblower system, see chapter G1 Business Conduct under G1-1 Corporate culture and business conduct policies.

In the business year 2024/25, no reports of violations pertaining to workers in the value chain (e.g., labor and human rights violations) were received via the whistleblower system or other communication channels.

SUPPLIER DEVELOPMENT

The engagement and active participation of suppliers and business partners is key to ensuring compliance with the voestalpine Code of Conduct for Business Partners. The due diligence process specifically helps vulnerable suppliers with inadequate sustainability performance to resolve identified shortcomings and taking corrective action. Following up on the performance evaluation helps to better understand and implement necessary changes. This process forms part of voestalpine’s broader Supplier Development Program, which aims to continuously improve sustainability performance.

As shown in the table below, supplier training, capacity building, cooperation, and engagement complement suppliers’ sustainable development activities.

Overview of supplier development actions

Supplier training and capacity building

 

Helping suppliers improve their practices with training and advice. This may include training on human rights, labor standards, environmental management, and prudent business conduct. Capacity building involves, for example, helping to solve specific issues faced by suppliers through the provision of expertise or supporting with the implementation of sustainable practices

Collaboration and engagement

 

Collaboration with stakeholders, including suppliers, civil society organizations, industry associations, and government agencies, is crucial when it comes to addressing systemic problems and promoting positive change

S2-4 – TAKING ACTION ON MATERIAL IMPACTS AND APPROACHES TO MANAGING MATERIAL RISKS, AND PURSUING MATERIAL OPPORTUNITIES RELATED TO VALUE CHAIN WORKERS AND THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THOSE ACTIONS AND APPROACHES

Key policies related to value chain workers are implemented as part of the CSDDD project realization. The expansion of the due diligence process, including a change policy for procurement governance and supplier screening, is to be actively promoted.

The conditions required for the expansion of the due diligence process, which was previously limited to companies subject to the Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG), to the whole group and all suppliers are currently being established by voestalpine. A key prerequisite for the Group-wide management of due diligence is the introduction of a comprehensive database that permits systematic risk analysis and management. In a second step, the global harmonization and consolidation of due diligence actions takes place in order to ensure uniform implementation within the Group.

One starting point is voestalpine’s existing Supplier Lifecycle Management system. This system involves a multi-stage process to establish, maintain, and develop relationships with suppliers. The focus is on the following aspects:

  • Ensuring supplier and delivery quality
  • Preventing and managing risks and threats
  • Establishing a transparently assessed pool of qualified suppliers
  • Complying with ESG and sustainability criteria

New suppliers are added to the database on the basis of risk and on a gradual basis. Supplier development is evaluated using a conventional supplier assessment. All relevant suppliers are classified as A, B, C, or D suppliers once a year. Depending on the product group, different criteria are included in the evaluation, such as environmental and quality management, innovative strength, flexibility, and adherence to deadlines. A and B suppliers enjoy preferential treatment in the procurement process. C and D suppliers are used to define targeted corrective actions that are to be implemented within a defined period of time. The corresponding implementation of the corrected actions is reviewed, for example, in follow-up assessments or in correspondence with the responsible procurement functions.

Supply chain due diligence obligations and the associated actions to prevent negative impacts on workers are to be implemented within the existing procurement structures. Human and organizational resources are continuously available to assist with this process. Resources earmarked specifically for this undertaking are not currently reported separately.

A clearly defined governance framework has been established for corporate procurement (see figure below), which regulates the dissemination principles and responsibility for implementation within the organization.

Governance framework for the Group procurement structure

Governance framework for the Group Procurement Structure (graphic)

Procurement governance follows a cascade principle: The Group defines binding minimum standards and specifications at the overarching level. Subordinate organizational units must operate within this framework and comply with the requirements of the respective superordinate level.

The executive management of the respective Group company is responsible for implementing Group-wide and divisional procurement guidelines, adjusting them if necessary to account for local circumstances or legal requirements, and for creating the necessary organizational framework. In addition, each Group company must contain written documentation of the form in which procurement is structured and regulated.

SUPPLIER ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE (SAQ)

Suppliers classified as potentially high or medium risk are subject to further risk assessment conducted in the form of the Supplier Assessment Questionnaire (SAQ). The SAQ reflects the requirements outlined in voestalpine’s CoC-BP and is designed to:

  • Identify actual human rights and environmental risks
  • Obtain information and evidence on compliance with the voestalpine CoC-BP
  • Determine targeted supplier development actions including further reviews of supplier risk such as on-site audits.

The SAQ is used to collect information on the following topics:

  • Compliance
  • Human rights and working conditions
  • Environmental protection and climate change mitigation
  • Management of the supply chain and reporting of misconduct

The structure of the questionnaire is based on the requested information and evidence (see table below). This includes: policy documents (e.g., guidelines), documentation on existing management systems (e.g., various ISO certifications), communication information (content and channels), KPIs, and other information on specific issues (e.g., the sourcing of conflict minerals and climate targets).

SAQ structure with sample questions and their purpose

Topic

 

Sample question

 

Purpose

 

 

 

 

 

Policy/guidelines

 

Does your organization have a formal guideline such as a code of conduct in place that addresses the requirements of voestalpine’s Code of Conduct for Business Partners?

 

Guidelines show that the company is committed to a specific issue and has a policy in place (principles and values, benchmarks, targets, etc.)

Management approach/system

 

Does your site have an environmental management system in place?

 

Management systems demonstrate the existence of formal processes

Communication

 

How do you ensure that your employees are made aware of and comply with your internal guidelines/code of conduct or other guidelines on environmental protection and climate change mitigation?

 

Communication ensures that the guidelines and procedures are acknowledged, implemented, and observed

KPIs/further information

 

Has your undertaking set CO2 emission reduction targets in its own operations and along the supply chain to work towards achieving the targets of the Paris Agreement (1.5° target)?

 

Internal KPIs show commitment and verify the implementation of policies

In accordance with the requirements of the Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG), the voestalpine Group has set up the new role of Human Rights Officer at each affected German voestalpine company. In addition, at Group level, the Head of Corporate Sustainability has been appointed human rights officer of the voestalpine Group.

Another key measure related to value chain workers is the integration of the sustainability topic block into the training program of the Group procurement structure (Purchasing Power Academy). For further information see chapter S1-4 Taking action on material impacts on own workforce, and approaches to managing material risks and pursuing material opportunities related to own workforce, and effectiveness of those actions.

Overview of actions

IROs addressed

 

Action

 

Core content and expected results

 

Time horizon

 

Scope of the action

 

Responsibility and monitoring

 

Significant expenditure (if relevant)

 

Other comments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financial claims and loss of reputation relating to potential labor exploitation in the supply chain (direct payments, in particular due to CSDDD; indirect losses due to poorer sustainability ratings)

 

CSDDD—Project Implementation

 

Actions to ensure compliance according to CSDDD by 2028

Determination of the necessary organizational requirements (roles, responsibilities, and competencies), in particular for the period after the project phase

Expansion of the due diligence process, including the creation and implementation of a change concept with regard to raising awareness within the procurement organization and among suppliers ​

Expected results:

  • CSDDD compliance by 2028

 

April 2025 – March 2028

 

Upstream value chain

Downstream value chain to a partial extent

 

Board of Procurement

 

 

  • Use of KPIs to monitor the share of sustainable suppliers

 

Supplier Assessment Questionnaire (SAQ)

 

Supplier questionnaire based on the voestalpine Code of Conduct for Business Partners

Request for proof of compliance, human rights, environmental protection, supply chain management, and whistleblower systems

Regular evaluation and adaptation to the latest legal requirements​

Expected results:

  • Fulfilment of regulatory requirements and minimized risk in supply chain
  • Promotion of transparency in the supply chain

 

Ongoing

 

Upstream value chain—and downstream value chain to a partial extent—for high-risk suppliers

 

Board of Procurement

 

 

 

Integration of the sustainability topic block into the training program of the Group procurement structure (Purchasing Power Academy)

 

Topic-specific training and online training initiatives on relevant purchasing topics with regard to sustainability (e.g., raising awareness of the Group sustainability strategy, involving suppliers in sustainability measures, Code of Conduct)
Offering the Certified Sustainable Procurement Professional external training program
Expected results:

  • Increased expertise on sustainability issues in procurement

 

Ongoing

 

Upstream value chain

Downstream value chain to a partial extent

All buyers

 

Board of Procurement

 

 

Metrics and targets

S2-5 – TARGETS RELATED TO MANAGING MATERIAL NEGATIVE IMPACTS, ADVANCING POSITIVE IMPACTS, AND MANAGING MATERIAL RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES

The voestalpine Group has initially set itself the target of reviewing at least 70% of its total procurement volume—including 100% of all relevant raw material deliveries—in line with a defined process for the application of established sustainability criteria by the end of the calendar year 2025. By the end of the business year 2024/25, 35% of the additional procurement volume had already been achieved in line with the sustainability criteria.

The aim of verifying the procurement volume using sustainability criteria is to prevent (potential) negative impacts on value chain workers, for example in the form of violations of fundamental labor rights.

Target: Increasing the share of sustainable suppliers

Target: Increasing the share of sustainable suppliers (graphic/table)

The aim behind this is to reduce risks related to compliance, hazards, or human rights infringement, and environmental impacts while achieving the specified sustainability criteria.

The review includes assessing whether suppliers meet the voestalpine sustainability criteria (e.g., acceptance of the Code of Conduct for Business Partners). The sustainability criteria were determined and pursued on the basis of internal analyses and regulatory requirements. Direct engagement of value chain workers or their representatives is not yet envisaged.

A strategic plan has been consistently pursued in recent business years in an attempt to ensure transparency and sustainability in the supply chain, thereby achieving important milestones (see figure) on the roadmap. The strategic plan is regularly reviewed and, where necessary, adapted.

voestalpine roadmap of sustainability activities and actions in the supply chain

voestalpine roadmap of sustainability activities and actions in the supply chain (graphic)

Services

Topics filter

Results